Is it really ‘art’?
Gerry first spoke in his presentation about the ideas of cultural identity and what happens when two cultures collide. I don’t know if that’s what really happened in ‘Couple in the Cage.’ I think the underlying action of the performance, or question that emulates, is ‘what happens when two cultures collide, especially when one of them is in a cage?’ Did the cultures really collide? Or did someone come up with a clever way of pointing out American ignorance and arrogance?
I think the inherent problem in ‘displaying’ something like ‘the couple’ is that the performance isn’t doing anything – it’s not going through a cultural collision, like No Saca Nada de la escuela, Othello, or Death and the King’s Horseman. The creators of ‘Couple’ have cleverly identified the Anglo-European habit of boxing things and selling them.
The word ‘art’ suggests artificial, and ‘Couple in the Cage’ is exactly that, but for some reason, I just don’t consider it art. I suppose the last three years of my training suggest that art requires a very specific technical knowledge and it seems to me that this performance did not/would not require a very specific type of technical knowledge. I do think that this performance required a very large knowledge of cultural understanding on the part of the performers. In that sense I think I suppose that this performance is more of an anthropological experiment. The goal of the performance was not to tell a story – like that of most contemporary theatre. ‘Couple in the Cage’ simply showed the results of a very controlled cross-cultural interaction.
So, is it art? Not in my book. We discussed the point briefly in class on Tuesday about the difference between an actor and a performer…which many in the class were very passionate in discussing. I’m not sure who voiced the opinion, but I agree that an actor is a performer, but a performer is not necessarily an actor. I suppose my own devotion to the study of acting for the theatre has taught me that what I do is much different from a comedian, juggler, guitar player, etc…While “Couple” is a very clever performance – it is in my opinion, not theatre.
1 comment:
Art versus anthropology. Expression and celebration versus specimen and experiment. I too was faced with these questions. The 'thing' they did was definatly a social message, and thus a contribution. But the tape, that goes beyond the impact that they wanted to make on those folks that they personally met. They then used those same people that they came into contact with: that they could directly impact. They then manipulated the organic experience into an inorganic video representation that is controlled by the editor.
Post a Comment